Security questionnaire software

Answer security questionnaires with sources — not a black box

TrustRespond is designed for teams that need traceable answers instead of fully automated claims. It connects customer questions to your documents while keeping approval with people.

Diese Seite auf Deutsch
B2B security teamsSales engineeringCompliance ownersvCISOs and consultants

Why generic AI is not enough

Chat output often does not show which document passage supports a claim.

Plausible answers can hide missing evidence.

Approval and ownership sit outside the workflow.

Sensitive documents require an explicitly agreed deployment and data process.

Review-first workflow

A controlled questionnaire workflow

  1. 1

    Use documents as bounded context

    Only relevant policies and evidence enter the agreed process.

  2. 2

    Generate answer plus source

    The draft includes a document reference and confidence indicator.

  3. 3

    Detect missing evidence

    Unsupported answers are marked and routed to subject-matter owners.

  4. 4

    Decide as a human

    No questionnaire is submitted autonomously; approval stays inside the organization.

Product boundaries and options

Every external statement remains subject to human review. TrustRespond supports evidence work; it does not certify compliance.

  • Current EU-hosted pilot in Frankfurt
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash in the hosted workflow
  • 90-day retention for documents and results
  • Private or on-premise only as a separately agreed engineering project

Frequently asked questions

Is TrustRespond fully autonomous?

No. It is intentionally review-first: people inspect sources, edit drafts and approve external statements.

Is BYOK available?

Not yet. BYOK is not implemented in the current hosted product.

Is there an on-premise version?

There is no self-installable standard edition. Private or on-premise deployment can be assessed and agreed as a separate engineering project.

Evaluate questionnaire software with your questions

The pilot shows strong matches, missing evidence and the real review effort required.